First Halo Video Review Hits the Net: "Best Halo Game Ever"

He said it was the best Halo game ever because there was no Flood . . .

First Halo Video Review Hits the Net: "Best Halo Game Ever" Implied-facepalm

TRF wrote:: He said it was the best Halo game ever because there was no Flood . . .

I take you're one of those ppl that liked The Library in Halo 1, or Cortana in Halo 3.

Freemon34-YT wrote:

TRF wrote:: He said it was the best Halo game ever because there was no Flood . . .

I take you're one of those ppl that liked The Library in Halo 1, or Cortana in Halo 3.

No, but that was just poor level design. Bungie could've easily found a more creative way to use the Flood. Besides, I liked every other level in Halo 3 that had the Flood in it.

Regardless of whether you like the Flood or not, I don't think that's a very good reason for it to be "the best Halo game ever".

@TRF

Dont be surprised if gamers do call Halo Reach the best halo game ever just because there are no flood.By the end of Halo 3,gamers were sick of the flood.Gamers love the Covenant,not flood

Overall,This review was extreamly positive.From what ive seen this game is a huge contender for GOTY.BIG contender.

Hahah awesome how you see Scarabs dropping from the sky(they are dropped by covenant cruisers if you guys are wondering).I mean,I LOVE scarabs and seeing them in Halo Reach makes me fill up with joy Very Happy

Flood sucks. True that in Halo 3 and Wars they are way more varied and fun to kill, but that doesn't deny they're continues suckage.
It feels more like a Duke Nukem enemy and not a Master Chief. They're just braindead zombies, and when Bungie try's to make them "smarter" with that venus shakespeare flytrap plant...its just retarded.

The review was kinda....lame. Guy seemed to review the game just to promote that Da$Cheap site at the end. He didn't even gave a score. LoLoL...

Petty Officer 1st Class Posts : 187 Join date : 2010-03-18

daveMastaKill wrote:: The review was kinda....lame. Guy seemed to review the game just to promote that Da$Cheap site at the end. He didn't even gave a score. LoLoL...

Yeah its not very professional.I just posted it cause its the first one out there

daveMastaKill wrote:: The review was kinda....lame. Guy seemed to review the game just to promote that Da$Cheap site at the end. He didn't even gave a score. LoLoL...

Yeah, he barely touched on anything. He barely said anything about the multiplayer, and didn't say much about the campaign either.

Lame review lol...The flood part made me laugh. Anyways, it's great to see some gameplay footages (Spiker is back, yay!).

I quite liked the flood. Especially the ones where you can shoot their "limbs" off Razz

It's such good fun.

I detested Cortana with a passion though. Grrrrraaaaaghhh

Very positive review and he didn't even talk about the multiplayer which is one of the biggest draws for Halo fans.

ghost23 wrote:: Very positive review and he didn't even talk about the multiplayer which is one of the biggest draws for Halo fans.

Well,he probally couldnt do multiplayer because if he did,MS would catch him.Halo Reach hasnt come out yet

Arbiteris wrote:

ghost23 wrote:: Very positive review and he didn't even talk about the multiplayer which is one of the biggest draws for Halo fans.

Well,he probally couldnt do multiplayer because if he did,MS would catch him.Halo Reach hasnt come out yet

Didn't reviewers receive the game early, though?

TRF wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

ghost23 wrote:: Very positive review and he didn't even talk about the multiplayer which is one of the biggest draws for Halo fans.

Well,he probally couldnt do multiplayer because if he did,MS would catch him.Halo Reach hasnt come out yet

Didn't reviewers receive the game early, though?

Yep IGN got Reach the same day as move. which was the 25th I think.

Freemon wrote:

TRF wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

ghost23 wrote:: Very positive review and he didn't even talk about the multiplayer which is one of the biggest draws for Halo fans.

Well,he probally couldnt do multiplayer because if he did,MS would catch him.Halo Reach hasnt come out yet

Didn't reviewers receive the game early, though?

Yep IGN got Reach the same day as move. which was the 25th I think.

So maybe he got it. I know it's kind of unlikely since he's only got 2,000 or so subs, but it's possible.

TRF wrote:

Freemon wrote:

TRF wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

ghost23 wrote:: Very positive review and he didn't even talk about the multiplayer which is one of the biggest draws for Halo fans.

Well,he probally couldnt do multiplayer because if he did,MS would catch him.Halo Reach hasnt come out yet

Didn't reviewers receive the game early, though?

Yep IGN got Reach the same day as move. which was the 25th I think.

So maybe he got it. I know it's kind of unlikely since he's only got 2,000 or so subs, but it's possible.

He works for a site so maybe. Even cheap sites like The Koalition get it early.

Freemon wrote:

TRF wrote:

Freemon wrote:

TRF wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

ghost23 wrote:: Very positive review and he didn't even talk about the multiplayer which is one of the biggest draws for Halo fans.

Well,he probally couldnt do multiplayer because if he did,MS would catch him.Halo Reach hasnt come out yet

Didn't reviewers receive the game early, though?

Yep IGN got Reach the same day as move. which was the 25th I think.

So maybe he got it. I know it's kind of unlikely since he's only got 2,000 or so subs, but it's possible.

He works for a site so maybe. Even cheap sites like The Koalition get it early.

Yeah, it could be that his site has more readers than the YouTube channel has subscribers.

Gotta say reach will be epic.. i watched the First level online ( no spoilers) Strange i know but MY God did my jaw drop From what i saw... I CANT WAIT FOR REACH....

Did he give it a score or something? Im too lazy to watch it.

PhunkGamer wrote:: Did he give it a score or something? Im too lazy to watch it.

No he didn't. But his comments were very positive. Don't think he said a single negative things about Reach.

Chief Petty Officer Posts : 368 Join date : 2010-07-14

daveMastaKill wrote:: The review was kinda....lame. Guy seemed to review the game just to promote that Da$Cheap site at the end. He didn't even gave a score. LoLoL...

I agree that it wasn't a good review, but a review doesn't need a score to be good.

Guest

GGM wrote:

daveMastaKill wrote:: The review was kinda....lame. Guy seemed to review the game just to promote that Da$Cheap site at the end. He didn't even gave a score. LoLoL...

I agree that it wasn't a good review, but a review doesn't need a score to be good.

True. I personally dont even pay attention to scores on reviews, I just listen or read what they thought about the game.

i think this review was okay,he only talked about the campaign and saying is the best halo game ever is kinda hard to believe in my opinion,i think halo 1 will forever stay as the best halo game in my opinion but ill get halo reach and i will see if its "best halo game ever" he didnt talked about the multiplayer and he didnt even said about firefight,he only said few things about forge we already know..sigh.this review was okay but i would rather see more in depth review than this one