IGN Top Disappointments of 2010

10.) Sonic 4: Episode 1
9.) Playstation Move
8.) Lost Planet 2
7.) Kane and Lynch 2: Dog Days
6.) Crackdown 2
5.) Microsoft Kinect
4.) Fable III
3.) Medal of Honor
2.) Gran Turismo 5
1.) Final Fantasy XIII

Source : http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/113/1136938p1.html

This stupid list is a reminder why I rarely visit IGN these days. What's funny is that they gave most of these games decent scores. I believe they even said FFXIII was the best RPG of this gen. And why is Medal of Honor on there? Because it's not Call of Duty?

Where is Metroid Other M and Final Fantasy XIV? MAG should of been on the list instead of GT5. They played GT5 for a whole 2 days before reviewing it and determined it was a huge disappointment. Get the fuck out of there, IGN. Your editors are completely out of touch with the gaming community.

I've gone off IGN. They are so inconsistent and contradictory with what they say its laughable. I'll stick with CVG. They're the only decent site I've come across.

I only watch IGN's Daily Fix and thats it. The rest of IGN is just retarded.

Some points i agree some not.

FF XIII and GT5 are spot on. Kinect and Fable 3 the shouldn't really be there. Move needs to be lower than 9. Crackdown 2 shouldn't be there.


Other stuff need to be on the list.

Metroid other M
PSN Plus.
Naughty Bear
Alpha Protocol
Dark Void
Split/Second

The only ones I agree with is Lost Planet 2, FFXIII, and Kane and Lynch 2.

GT5 number 2? Lol?

Alan1994 wrote:

The only ones I agree with is Lost Planet 2, FFXIII, and Kane and Lynch 2.

GT5 number 2? Lol?

I know. Stupid IGN. It should be no.1

Invincible wrote:

10.) Sonic 4: Episode 1
9.) Playstation Move
8.) Lost Planet 2
7.) Kane and Lynch 2: Dog Days
6.) Crackdown 2
5.) Microsoft Kinect
4.) Fable III
3.) Medal of Honor
2.) Gran Turismo 5
1.) Final Fantasy XIII

Source : http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/113/1136938p1.html

This stupid list is a reminder why I rarely visit IGN these days. What's funny is that they gave most of these games decent scores. I believe they even said FFXIII was the best RPG of this gen. And why is Medal of Honor on there? Because it's not Call of Duty?

Where is Metroid Other M and Final Fantasy XIV? MAG should of been on the list instead of GT5. They played GT5 for a whole 2 days before reviewing it and determined it was a huge disappointment. Get the fuck out of there, IGN. Your editors are completely out of touch with the gaming community.

Fable III and GT5 are disappointments? What BS

It's official: IGN don't know what they're talking about any more.

And no COD?!?! It got 1 point lower than MW2.

Aksys wrote:

And no COD?!?! It got 1 point lower than MW2.

To be fair, COD's not all that bad.

But MW2's definitely better. And it shouldn't really be on that list. But the same can be said for plenty of other games which are on the list.

Sweet Mercy wrote:

Invincible wrote:

10.) Sonic 4: Episode 1
9.) Playstation Move
8.) Lost Planet 2
7.) Kane and Lynch 2: Dog Days
6.) Crackdown 2
5.) Microsoft Kinect
4.) Fable III
3.) Medal of Honor
2.) Gran Turismo 5
1.) Final Fantasy XIII

Source : http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/113/1136938p1.html

This stupid list is a reminder why I rarely visit IGN these days. What's funny is that they gave most of these games decent scores. I believe they even said FFXIII was the best RPG of this gen. And why is Medal of Honor on there? Because it's not Call of Duty?

Where is Metroid Other M and Final Fantasy XIV? MAG should of been on the list instead of GT5. They played GT5 for a whole 2 days before reviewing it and determined it was a huge disappointment. Get the fuck out of there, IGN. Your editors are completely out of touch with the gaming community.

Fable III and GT5 are disappointments? What BS

It's official: IGN don't know what they're talking about any more.

umm, GT5 and Fable III were dissapointments to many people

Its a good list, but id wish they had Other M in there

Kinect?
All the IGN editors were talking about how much they didn't care about Kinect a few months before it launch and when they finally tried it they were going on about how it surprised them and that it actually worked. How that is a disappointment I don't know.

ghost23 wrote:

Kinect?
All the IGN editors were talking about how much they didn't care about Kinect a few months before it launch and when they finally tried it they were going on about how it surprised them and that it actually worked. How that is a disappointment I don't know.

I'm guessing it's not all the same people who do this stuff. Must've been a different editor.

You find strange contradictions like that quite often in magazines and sites that review stuff. Different critics have different opinions. lol

DemonWolf wrote:

ghost23 wrote:

Kinect?
All the IGN editors were talking about how much they didn't care about Kinect a few months before it launch and when they finally tried it they were going on about how it surprised them and that it actually worked. How that is a disappointment I don't know.

I'm guessing it's not all the same people who do this stuff. Must've been a different editor.

You find strange contradictions like that quite often in magazines and sites that review stuff. Different critics have different opinions. lol

True, but IGN are notorious for it. They praised the hell out of Fable III in their review yet a week later they put up an article on how it was such a disappointment . . . . . .

Stoney wrote:

DemonWolf wrote:

ghost23 wrote:

Kinect?
All the IGN editors were talking about how much they didn't care about Kinect a few months before it launch and when they finally tried it they were going on about how it surprised them and that it actually worked. How that is a disappointment I don't know.

I'm guessing it's not all the same people who do this stuff. Must've been a different editor.

You find strange contradictions like that quite often in magazines and sites that review stuff. Different critics have different opinions. lol

True, but IGN are notorious for it. They praised the hell out of Fable III in their review yet a week later they put up an article on how it was such a disappointment . . . . . .

Not everyone on IGN have the same oppinion....

IGn isnt one person, but instead a bunch of different editors

Arbiteris wrote:

Not everyone on IGN have the same oppinion....

IGn isnt one person, but instead a bunch of different IDIOTS.

Fixed. =P

Arbiteris wrote:

Stoney wrote:

DemonWolf wrote:

ghost23 wrote:

Kinect?
All the IGN editors were talking about how much they didn't care about Kinect a few months before it launch and when they finally tried it they were going on about how it surprised them and that it actually worked. How that is a disappointment I don't know.

I'm guessing it's not all the same people who do this stuff. Must've been a different editor.

You find strange contradictions like that quite often in magazines and sites that review stuff. Different critics have different opinions. lol

True, but IGN are notorious for it. They praised the hell out of Fable III in their review yet a week later they put up an article on how it was such a disappointment . . . . . .

Not everyone on IGN have the same oppinion....

IGn isnt one person, but instead a bunch of different editors

Yes but when you run a site like IGN, you have to be fairly consistent overall. A regular consumer who Googles "Kinect Reviews" and sees that one article is praising it on how much it surprised them and then you have another talking about how much of a disappointment it was, that's when a site begins to lose its integrity. You have to remember that a lot of people think about IGN as one single entity, not as a group of different people with different tastes in gaming.