LMAO Another PS3 exclusive flops - Gamespot give White Knight Story a dismal 6,0

daveMastaKill wrote:

Some consoles have RPG's like Mass Effect 2, other consoles have....well...sucks to be them.

Zillah wrote:

- EVERYONE LOOK!

this reviewers are NOT gamers .

Sure, they play a game for a time period ; do they keep playing it though .?

NO .
They play for what they get paid for .

PS3 fantards sing praises when the reviewers give out 9 or above, yet they call for boycotts when the game turns out to really not be good. Oh and why shouldn't they get payed to play games? It doesn't make them less of a gamer and your not going to get volunteers to play though a crap game like this.

lol just further proof Xbox 360 has 2010

Zillah wrote:

- EVERYONE LOOK!

this reviewers are NOT gamers .

Sure, they play a game for a time period ; do they keep playing it though .?

NO .
They play for what they get paid for .

you basically said uncharted2 is shit right there

Zillah wrote:

- EVERYONE LOOK!

this reviewers are NOT gamers .

Sure, they play a game for a time period ; do they keep playing it though .?

NO .
They play for what they get paid for .

Wait,are you from the Wii network?

OMG!!!!MICROSOFT PAID IGN TO RATE THIS GAME LOW!!!!!!

5.1 Mediocre. LMAO!!!!!!

Master_Chief wrote:

5.1 Mediocre. LMAO!!!!!!

Oh now thats embarrassing.

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

Master_Chief wrote:

5.1 Mediocre. LMAO!!!!!!

Oh now thats embarrassing.

I almost bet that truth will make a review of this review

Ehh, reviews mean nothing to me.
I've got it coming in the mail soon so I might do an un-bias review like I did for Mass Effect 2.

MAG gets a 76 average (which aint bad at all, and I actually wish Xbox had something like it) and then WKC gets a 5.1 from IGN lol

MICROSOFT PAYS REVIEWERS!!!
Lol jk.

But I don't let reviews keep me from playing a game.
Two Worlds and Fracture got really bad reviews but I love the games.
Quite a few other great games get tossed aside because of reviews but these are the only two that I have actually played.
Fracture/ 5.9 Two Worlds/ 6.5

hahahahahaha and friend of mine all these years: xbox 360 rpg's all fail they get rated real low (they all got 7/8/9s).

I gotta love this review. Going to email it to him right away. He is going to pick this game up this week lololololol.

XBOXROX wrote:

hahahahahaha and friend of mine all these years: xbox 360 rpg's all fail they get rated real low (they all got 7/8/9s).

I gotta love this review. Going to email it to him right away. He is going to pick this game up this week lololololol.

LOL

XBOXROX wrote:

hahahahahaha and friend of mine all these years: xbox 360 rpg's all fail they get rated real low (they all got 7/8/9s).

I gotta love this review. Going to email it to him right away. He is going to pick this game up this week lololololol.

LMAO

DustinDutRank wrote:

Ehh, reviews mean nothing to me.
I've got it coming in the mail soon so I might do an un-bias review like I did for Mass Effect 2.

If it got 8 or 9 out of ten would you still do a review? And what do you mean un-bias? It was just a honest review. Plain and simple.

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

DustinDutRank wrote:

Ehh, reviews mean nothing to me.
I've got it coming in the mail soon so I might do an un-bias review like I did for Mass Effect 2.

If it got 8 or 9 out of ten would you still do a review? And what do you mean un-bias? It was just a honest review. Plain and simple.

Sure I would. By un-bias I mean not being favorited to another system. Like the people who gave Mass Effect 2 perfect scores when there are clearly a few problems. I know reviews are based on opinions but I'm just saying you can't go by them all the time or you will miss out on some really fun games.

we truly live in a golden age.

DustinDutRank wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

DustinDutRank wrote:

Ehh, reviews mean nothing to me.
I've got it coming in the mail soon so I might do an un-bias review like I did for Mass Effect 2.

If it got 8 or 9 out of ten would you still do a review? And what do you mean un-bias? It was just a honest review. Plain and simple.

Sure I would. By un-bias I mean not being favorited to another system. Like the people who gave Mass Effect 2 perfect scores when there are clearly a few problems. I know reviews are based on opinions but I'm just saying you can't go by them all the time or you will miss out on some really fun games.

The only problem I saw with Mass Effect 2 was the tedious scanning of planets. Other than that it was almost perfect.

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

DustinDutRank wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

DustinDutRank wrote:

Ehh, reviews mean nothing to me.
I've got it coming in the mail soon so I might do an un-bias review like I did for Mass Effect 2.

If it got 8 or 9 out of ten would you still do a review? And what do you mean un-bias? It was just a honest review. Plain and simple.

Sure I would. By un-bias I mean not being favorited to another system. Like the people who gave Mass Effect 2 perfect scores when there are clearly a few problems. I know reviews are based on opinions but I'm just saying you can't go by them all the time or you will miss out on some really fun games.

The only problem I saw with Mass Effect 2 was the tedious scanning of planets. Other than that it was almost perfect.

So your squad mates did everything you told them and never ran into the middle of gun fire or stood out of cover too long and got killed? Panet scanning isn't really a problem because it does what it is supposed to do. More of an inconvenience to some people.

DustinDutRank wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

DustinDutRank wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

DustinDutRank wrote:

Ehh, reviews mean nothing to me.
I've got it coming in the mail soon so I might do an un-bias review like I did for Mass Effect 2.

If it got 8 or 9 out of ten would you still do a review? And what do you mean un-bias? It was just a honest review. Plain and simple.

Sure I would. By un-bias I mean not being favorited to another system. Like the people who gave Mass Effect 2 perfect scores when there are clearly a few problems. I know reviews are based on opinions but I'm just saying you can't go by them all the time or you will miss out on some really fun games.

The only problem I saw with Mass Effect 2 was the tedious scanning of planets. Other than that it was almost perfect.

So your squad mates did everything you told them and never ran into the middle of gun fire or stood out of cover too long and got killed? Panet scanning isn't really a problem because it does what it is supposed to do. More of an inconvenience to some people.

The partner Ai isnt bad at all.They go anywhere i tell them too.

Besides,i dont think you really should have to rely on your partner's.I could have beat the game fine without them.

DustinDutRank wrote:

MICROSOFT PAYS REVIEWERS!!!
Lol jk.

But I don't let reviews keep me from playing a game.
Two Worlds and Fracture got really bad reviews but I love the games.
Quite a few other great games get tossed aside because of reviews but these are the only two that I have actually played.
Fracture/ 5.9 Two Worlds/ 6.5

If only one reviwer said the game was bad,while the other 20 said it sucked,it would buy the game.

Just look at Halo Wars.That retarted reveiwer on Gamespot gave it a 6.5!While the other's gave it like 8.5's and 8's.

Partner AI is a problem.
Try playing Insanity without having to retry any missions as a Biotic or Tech oriented class.
They go where you tell them to but they still get themselves killed when they should be ducking behind cover.

Arbiteris wrote:

OMG!!!!MICROSOFT PAID IGN TO RATE THIS GAME LOW!!!!!!

OMG!!!!!IT MUST BE TRUE SINCE ALL PS3 GAMES ARE PERFECT!!!!!! lol, great joke man.