Lens of Truth:Bioshock 2- 360 vs PS3 - 360 wins again.

As usual the 360 version is superior.
http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=17989

victory

Petty Officer 3rd Class Posts : 90 Join date : 2010-01-10

saw this coming after bioshock 1 was terrible in ps3.

ZaFtxX wrote:: saw this coming after bioshock 1 was terrible in ps3.

True. Thats really sad considering that the PS3 version came out a year later and they still couldnt make it on par with the 360 version.

They mention loading time being faster on 360, but it's even faster if you install the game.

ghost23 wrote:

ZaFtxX wrote:: saw this coming after bioshock 1 was terrible in ps3.

True. Thats really sad considering that the PS3 version came out a year later and they still couldnt make it on par with the 360 version.

QFT Btw heres the conclusion Digital Foundry came to (the same).
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-bioshock2-face-off-article?page=3

Article from beginning.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-bioshock2-face-off-article

the usual. Razz

I cant believe it!!!! (sarcasim) Razz

daveMastaKill wrote:

Lol

I'm not surprised. The PS3 version of the original was a joke.

ZaFtxX wrote:: saw this coming after bioshock 1 was terrible in ps3.

Same happened with Lost Planet.

Lt Xplosi wrote:

daveMastaKill wrote:

Lol

LMAO!!!!!

God the ps3 version looks pretty bad, particularly the water effects.

Lmao check out this person's comment: "I prefer my candles without Legos on top." xD

Where the hell is this monster playslaves keep rambling on about? I mean I went out & bought a PS3 & have been looking for that monster of a console every since. All I keep seeing is terrible ports of games that run smoother & have sharper clearer better graphics on the 360.... Only game that I saw used the PS3's power was KZ2, and that game was choppier then a japanese sushi chef.