Bungie Talks Visual Upgrades In Halo: Reach; Still Not Close To KillZone 2, BULLSHIT

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Bungie-Talks-Visual-Upgrades-In-Halo-Reach-Still-Not-Close-To-KillZone-2-22853.html guys just upset,

that guy who wrote it is an arse

Lol.... I dont think he could know... The game is still in Alpha/Beta stage while KZ2 is already done.. If you look at the vidoc you see all the improvements and touches they have made.. Its looks "effin" incredible at its Alpha stage...

Cant wait for the Beta, but thing is that i will be playing BC2 then ....


Still this is going to be great for 360 owners, the last bungie halo game.

The graphics in KZ2 makes Gears of War 2 a fucking rainbow. I mean that shit is either dark, grey or brown/red. Total bullshit...

Besides if i was a PS3 only owner KZ2 will be the like the 4rd game i would talk about in term of graphics powers i mean: Uncharted 2, Metal Gear Solid 4, God Of War 3......

But of couse only people that are has BLIND has PS3 fanboys says that KZ2 is the real deal in the gaming biz.

butthurt at its finest.

Lt Xplosi wrote:

that guy who wrote it is an arse

QFT
I mean what the hell is that person thinking?!


"Halo 3 looked like crap to be considered “next-gen”…it barely looked like it graduated from the visuals of the original Xbox. "

Funny, the texture detail is unmatched by many games that come out today!
Seriously, in some aspects of Halo 3 the graphics are superior to MW2's.

"Bungie has finally brought the visuals of the Halo series up to par with maybe, the first Mass Effect."

This is bullshit. The graphics are actually superior to Mass Effect easily. Take a look at the gameplay. At one point the camera zooms out from a close-up of some structure/building. The detail of the texture is impressive to say the least.

God, the person who wrote this is so ignorant.

demondragondude wrote:

Lt Xplosi wrote:

that guy who wrote it is an arse

QFT
I mean what the hell is that person thinking?!


"Halo 3 looked like crap to be considered “next-gen”…it barely looked like it graduated from the visuals of the original Xbox. "

Funny, the texture detail is unmatched by many games that come out today!
Seriously, in some aspects of Halo 3 the graphics are superior to MW2's.

"Bungie has finally brought the visuals of the Halo series up to par with maybe, the first Mass Effect."

This is bullshit. The graphics are actually superior to Mass Effect easily. Take a look at the gameplay. At one point the camera zooms out from a close-up of some structure/building. The detail of the texture is impressive to say the least.

God, the person who wrote this is so ignorant.

the guy who wrote it needs glasses and a functional brain

Butthurt much?

daveMastaKill wrote:

The graphics in KZ2 makes Gears of War 2 a fucking rainbow. I mean that shit is either dark, grey or brown/red. Total bullshit...

I agree. I never understood the big deal about Killzone 2 graphics. The dark grey and brown/red filters on it look like crap imo. And the character models faces look low poly. Killzone 2 also has alot of flat looking textures scattered throughout the game. But for the most part the graphics still look good but its a corridor shooter confined to small places. Halo Reach has huge scale AND good graphics. Halo Reach looks leagues above Killzone 2 and its still in Alpha stage.

when i had ps3 i owned killzone 2. the graphics were great, but it was a game based in confined spaces. halo: reach is an open ended shooter with big environments, shit halo 3 had massive levels.

any game can look good when its confined as fuck and ironically all these ps3 exclusives are like this.

i bet that ps3fans have never even heard of a exclusive with scope for there console, other than mag that only had the players as there scope, which is nothing like we get when we get exclusives with scope in every category

ZaFtxX wrote:

when i had ps3 i owned killzone 2. the graphics were great, but it was a game based in confined spaces. halo: reach is an open ended shooter with big environments, shit halo 3 had massive levels.

any game can look good when its confined as fuck and ironically all these ps3 exclusives are like this.

QFT I notice that too.

ZaFtxX wrote:

when i had ps3 i owned killzone 2. the graphics were great, but it was a game based in confined spaces. halo: reach is an open ended shooter with big environments, shit halo 3 had massive levels.

any game can look good when its confined as fuck and ironically all these ps3 exclusives are like this.

QFT. Take Heavy Rain for example. That has good graphics because the only thing going on on-screen is some guy walking or taking a piss. Theres no shooting or explosions or anything like that which sucks a lot of power from the hardware. If Bungie made a game like that using the Reach engine, it would look 10x better than Heavy Rain.

PS3 fanboys should stop saying Heavy Rain has good graphics because it really is not up to where it should be based on the fact that there is basically nothing going on on-screen compared to a FPS.

sony fanboys are graphics whores now?

the ps1 and ps2 looked like ass compared to the competition...........now graphics mean everything lol

GeneralMLD wrote:

sony fanboys are graphics whores now?

the ps1 and ps2 looked like ass compared to the competition...........now graphics mean everything lol

I actually have a lot, and i mean a lot of respect for both PSOne and the PS2, like i've said in previous posts.
It got the "worst hardware" but when it manage to pull it off was awesome, and i've never gave a rat's ass about it was "not has powerful".
But now with the PS3, it looks like they went berserker about making a console with more power, only compared to like, i dunno...the PC itself.
Well Sony failed, until today i didn't see one exclusive with graphics that blows 360 exclusives like Gears of War, Mass Effect, Alan Wake and the upcoming Halo Reach.

yet again people thinking graphics are all about how realistic a game looks, heavy rain for exsample looks real but at the same time zzzzzzzzzzz

they just want hits on thier website. i wouldnt bother with the artical. ps3 fanboys will just suck it up and visit that site more.

Somebody said that Halo Reach's visuals are in the future of gaming. Now somebody says that isn't close to Killzone 2's???

we cant judge halo reach yet,its still alpha stage,when the game launches this fall,we will see if its better or worse than kz2

CommanderShepherd324 wrote:

we cant judge halo reach yet,its still alpha stage,when the game launches this fall,we will see if its better or worse than kz2

It already looks better than KZ2.

For real, Halo Reach visuals that have been shown are PRE-ALPHA and MAYBE Alpha......We will see how the game is progressing once we get our hands on the BETA.