360 VS PS3 (A, AA, AAA) 2010 FINALIZED

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

You bastard. Take that back. :p

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

Just because it doesn't interest YOU, doesn't mean it won't stand out.

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

Just because it doesn't interest YOU, doesn't mean it won't stand out.

Lol, your sig is hilarious.

Alan1994 wrote:

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

Just because it doesn't interest YOU, doesn't mean it won't stand out.

Lol, your sig is hilarious.

Thank you kind sir

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

Just because it doesn't interest YOU, doesn't mean it won't stand out.

I never said it wouldn't stand out, you fucking scrub.

TRF wrote:

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

Just because it doesn't interest YOU, doesn't mean it won't stand out.

I never said it wouldn't stand out, you fucking scrub.

Quote :

By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

no GT5. aka, doesn't stand out. Someone's having a tizzy fit

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

Just because it doesn't interest YOU, doesn't mean it won't stand out.

I never said it wouldn't stand out, you fucking scrub.

Quote :

By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

no GT5. aka, doesn't stand out. Someone's having a tizzy fit

I meant that it wouldn't stand out for me. It's my opinion. Different things stand out for different people. I think you need to learn the difference between fact and opinion.

TRF wrote:

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

-jaz350z- wrote:

TRF wrote:

LittleBigGeek wrote:

TRF wrote:

Looking back, I think that the 360 and PS3 pretty much tied this year (so far, at least). By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

I've gotta say, the 360 pleasantly surprised me this year. Good show, Microsoft.

Gran Turismo 5? thats like the ps3's Halo

It doesn't interest me.

Just because it doesn't interest YOU, doesn't mean it won't stand out.

I never said it wouldn't stand out, you fucking scrub.

Quote :

By the end of the year, three 360 games and three PS3 games will have stood out: Splinter Cell: Conviction, Fable III, and Halo: Reach vs. God of War III, Heavy Rain, and LittleBigPlanet 2.

no GT5. aka, doesn't stand out. Someone's having a tizzy fit

I meant that it wouldn't stand out for me. It's my opinion. Different things stand out for different people. I think you need to learn the difference between fact and opinion.

You didn't say it was your opinion, it was stated as fact.

-jaz350z- wrote:

You didn't say it was your opinion, it was stated as fact.

I'm sick of stating things as my opinion. Of course it's my opinion. There's a clear distinction between fact and opinion, and if you can't see that, then it's your problem, not mine.

My oppinion>>>>>>Everyone else's

Learn that and you will someday be as big of a success as me

-jaz350z- wrote:

You didn't say it was your opinion, it was stated as fact.

He never said it was a fact either did he? People shouldn't have to put "imo" at the end of every sentence. It's very clear that he meant it in his opinion.

BlackStigma wrote:

-jaz350z- wrote:

You didn't say it was your opinion, it was stated as fact.

He never said it was a fact either did he? People shouldn't have to put "imo" at the end of every sentence. It's very clear that he meant it in his opinion.

EXACTLY. Thank you Stigma. Hallelujah, someone else gets it!

What can we expect from GT5 anyways? I mean it's been in the making so long that reviewers might be a little harsh on it.

Alan1994 wrote:

What can we expect from GT5 anyways? I mean it's been in the making so long that reviewers might be a little harsh on it.

I hope they don't. I think the games should be judged by the GAME, not the amount of time leading to its release.

TRF wrote:

Alan1994 wrote:

What can we expect from GT5 anyways? I mean it's been in the making so long that reviewers might be a little harsh on it.

I hope they don't. I think the games should be judged by the GAME, not the amount of time leading to its release.

Could explain why COD is always AAA. They pump out a new title every year .

Alan1994 wrote:

TRF wrote:

Alan1994 wrote:

What can we expect from GT5 anyways? I mean it's been in the making so long that reviewers might be a little harsh on it.

I hope they don't. I think the games should be judged by the GAME, not the amount of time leading to its release.

Could explain why COD is always AAA. They pump out a new title every year .

Yeah, but that would also result in Dynasty Warriors games getting good reviews, wouldn't it?

Alan1994 wrote:

TRF wrote:

Alan1994 wrote:

What can we expect from GT5 anyways? I mean it's been in the making so long that reviewers might be a little harsh on it.

I hope they don't. I think the games should be judged by the GAME, not the amount of time leading to its release.

Could explain why COD is always AAA. They pump out a new title every year .

That's because reviewers do private matches amongst each other and no one wants to be an ass and camp when playing with their co workers. If they waited to review the games a month after launch they'd be getting 6's and 5's.

BlackStigma wrote:

Alan1994 wrote:

TRF wrote:

Alan1994 wrote:

What can we expect from GT5 anyways? I mean it's been in the making so long that reviewers might be a little harsh on it.

I hope they don't. I think the games should be judged by the GAME, not the amount of time leading to its release.

Could explain why COD is always AAA. They pump out a new title every year .

That's because reviewers do private matches amongst each other and no one wants to be an ass and camp when playing with their co workers. If they waited to review the games a month after launch they'd be getting 6's and 5's.

Camping is the least of MW2's problems. MW2 has connection issues, glitches, so many hacks, very unbalanced weapons, etc.

Alan1994 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Alan1994 wrote:

TRF wrote:

Alan1994 wrote:

What can we expect from GT5 anyways? I mean it's been in the making so long that reviewers might be a little harsh on it.

I hope they don't. I think the games should be judged by the GAME, not the amount of time leading to its release.

Could explain why COD is always AAA. They pump out a new title every year .

That's because reviewers do private matches amongst each other and no one wants to be an ass and camp when playing with their co workers. If they waited to review the games a month after launch they'd be getting 6's and 5's.

Camping is the least of MW2's problems. MW2 has connection issues, glitches, so many hacks, very unbalanced weapons, etc.

I'm just saying that it gets good scores because reviewers play private matches with their coworkers, other reviewers, or the developer staff, so they don't experience those listed problems so the game doesn't get marked down for them like it should.

added kinect and move sections now since PS move games have begun to be reviewed.

GeneralMLD wrote:

added kinect and move sections now since PS move games have begun to be reviewed.

Lol, a AAA rated casual game is still crap. It's just shovelware for pete's sake. Might as well add a list games that got 20-30 % review scores.

GeneralMLD wrote:

added kinect and move sections now since PS move games have begun to be reviewed.

Are you listing only games that require Move? Or ones that are compatible with it too?

Invincible wrote:

GeneralMLD wrote:

added kinect and move sections now since PS move games have begun to be reviewed.

Are you listing only games that require Move? Or ones that are compatible with it too?

not sure. in theory games that cant be played with a Dual shock 3.........and games that cant be played by a 360 controller.

Alan1994 wrote:

GeneralMLD wrote:

added kinect and move sections now since PS move games have begun to be reviewed.

Lol, a AAA rated casual game is still crap. It's just shovelware for pete's sake. Might as well add a list games that got 20-30 % review scores.

Casual doesn't dictate the quality of a game. Plants vs Zombies is "casual", but it's fun.

Alan1994 wrote:

GeneralMLD wrote:

added kinect and move sections now since PS move games have begun to be reviewed.

Lol, a AAA rated casual game is still crap. It's just shovelware for pete's sake. Might as well add a list games that got 20-30 % review scores.

If I didn't know any better, I would say you just called Tetris shovelware.