Halo Reach graphics comparison.

Fully-ingame cinematic versus pre-rendered trailer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWQpj20NzlI

Not bad, in some way the ingame one looks crisper.

The ingame actually looks better.

No doubt Reach looks amazing.

Master_Chief wrote:

The ingame actually looks better.

The ingame warthog actually has more detail and the spartan has better textures in the ingame one, but I kinda did like the lighting in the prerendered trailer.

Don't really care about the graphics since the gameplay is beast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But the graphics are pretty nice, they're gonna look way better when I have it hooked up to my tv with hdmi!!!!

I actually think the warthog looks a little more realistic (more smoother) on the prerendered one but has a bit less detail too on the prerendered one.

In game looks better somehow. The armour texture looks phenominal.

The shot of Noble Team in the recent trailer was the highlight of Reach's graphics for me. The character models look so stunning

demondragondude wrote:

I actually think the warthog looks a little more realistic (more smoother) on the prerendered one but has a bit less detail too on the prerendered one.

In game looks better somehow. The armour texture looks phenominal.

That's generally because Pre-rendered stuff usually never has jaggies.

EDIT:

I'm still suprised its getting to the point where ingame graphics can even be compared to pre-rendered .

Alan1994 wrote:

demondragondude wrote:

I actually think the warthog looks a little more realistic (more smoother) on the prerendered one but has a bit less detail too on the prerendered one.

In game looks better somehow. The armour texture looks phenominal.

That's generally because Pre-rendered stuff usually never has jaggies.

EDIT:

I'm still suprised its getting to the point where ingame graphics can even be compared to pre-rendered .

QFT

I thought the lighting was better on the pre-rendered one and I noticed the lack of the dust blowing in the wind on the in-game clip. I don't care because i'm all about gameplay first, graphics second.

Yusuke Urameshi wrote:

Don't really care about the graphics since the gameplay is beast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But the graphics are pretty nice, they're gonna look way better when I have it hooked up to my tv with hdmi!!!!

Hell yeah, with amazing gameplay and graphics this game will PWN!

on the video someone said that bungie fixed the lighting thing so mayby on release it will just not have the Atmosphere filter on.. Looks kinda better more detail on the warthog and spartan.. WE NEED A KILLZONE 2 COMPARISON

day walker wrote:

on the video someone said that bungie fixed the lighting thing so mayby on release it will just not have the Atmosphere filter on.. Looks kinda better more detail on the warthog and spartan.. WE NEED A KILLZONE 2 COMPARISON

I think KZ2 has better graphics from what I've seen. But KZ2 is destroyed by everything else, from story, gameplay, and every other characteristic in a game. Well aside from the anger you get when a foul mouthed wanna-be badass gets downed every 5 seconds.

Alan1994 wrote:

demondragondude wrote:

I actually think the warthog looks a little more realistic (more smoother) on the prerendered one but has a bit less detail too on the prerendered one.

In game looks better somehow. The armour texture looks phenominal.

That's generally because Pre-rendered stuff usually never has jaggies.

EDIT:

I'm still suprised its getting to the point where ingame graphics can even be compared to pre-rendered .

QFT