So I was playing Modern Warfare 2...

At a friend's house, and wow I don't know how people can play that game! My friend said he prestieged 3 times already and I asked what that meant, and I already know what it means now. Since, I'm more of a run and gunner, he recommended me to use Marathon and UMP45 and he said I could have any option with the last two perks+ the grenades. I chose Stopping Power and Steady Aim. For the nades, flashbangs and frag.

Well, I love the sound of the UMP45 and god it' is amazingly powerful, I just destroy people with it and he set my killstreak thingy to uav, care package, and pred missle because he said it's the most easiest setup to use. It was pretty fun untill I found out how ridden the campers are in this damn game. I would just wander around and then some dude is like behind some cover and kill me and I would watch my killcam and he just stands there! Wtf? Oh and I cannot believe the Energy Sword is in this game. That commando perk is just pure BS. I mean I had like 3 times where i just shoot some dude in the face like 3-5 times and he just knifes me-what's up with that? I hate those fu**ers that just run around with marathon and lightweight with that commando perk, it's just so unfair. Not only that, Commando seems to be one of the most overused third perk and that just digusts me. Oh and the grenade launcher is just ridiculous. I know why people call it the noob tube now.

I stopped playing the game once some dude got his Chopper Gunner which is probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen in a competitive shooter. That thing is a monster and my friend told me I had to hide and it just ruins the experience to me. You guys got my respect who can actually play this game without getting frustrated or angry.

ZeInFormer wrote:

You guys got my respect who can actually play this game without getting frustrated or angry.

I feel the same.

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

The whole point of multiplayer is who can hit the right trigger faster. Unlike games like Halo where you actually have to be pulling off headshots with the DMR which requires a large amount of skill.

Battlefield is the only FPS worth playing on a console in my book. Seriously, Battlefield shits all over Call of duty.

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

I can

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

Damn straight I was, 'tis how I know. I'm not speaking out of my ass like a lot of other people do.

ghost23 wrote:

The whole point of multiplayer is who can hit the right trigger faster. Unlike games like Halo where you actually have to be pulling off headshots with the DMR which requires a large amount of skill.

I wouldn't exactly say it takes a great amount of skill...

lol @ the energy sword bit. Yeah I know what you mean. The hit detection is awful! I mean, I shoot someone, with a burst of bullets from the SCAR and yet they manage to take me down with like 2 leg/chest height shots. How is that realistic?! How can they take several bullets to the head and live to tell the tale and take even more bullets and still survive?!
Stupid crap. lol
Yet it's really addictive.

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

What?! Battlefield Bad Company 2 though is a masterpiece!
The hit detection is better
The firing of the weapons is more realistic (like bullet dipping slightly as it goes further)
The knifing is risky and are best used only for stealth attacks, otherwise you face the risk of being shot, like in real life
There are hardly any campers
There is like no frustration whatsoever
There are better designed locations, not built for camping
There are vehicles
There's like none of that ridiculously overpowerered killstreak bullshit
There are better visuals in BBC2 than MW2
There is actually destructibility
People actually play the game it's meant to be played as opposed to ruining the game for everyone through either noobtubing or camping, just to get the highest score at the end. >.< (or to get freaking tactical nukes)

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

ghost23 wrote:

The whole point of multiplayer is who can hit the right trigger faster. Unlike games like Halo where you actually have to be pulling off headshots with the DMR which requires a large amount of skill.

I wouldn't exactly say it takes a great amount of skill...

If you're playing MLG Pro where basically no radars and every single shot fired basically has to be a headshot and people strafe like crazy, it gets pretty damn hard.

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

Damn straight I was, 'tis how I know. I'm not speaking out of my ass like a lot of other people do.

So you play shit games? lol

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

Damn straight I was, 'tis how I know. I'm not speaking out of my ass like a lot of other people do.

So you play shit games? lol

Nah I was just getting some campaign achievements. I like the campaigns of COD and BFBC but the online on them is just horrid.

MW2 sucks. Only good thing about it is the campaign. Other than that I would not buy it. The multiplayer just pisses me the hell off.

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

Damn straight I was, 'tis how I know. I'm not speaking out of my ass like a lot of other people do.

So you play shit games? lol

Nah I was just getting some campaign achievements. I like the campaigns of COD and BFBC but the online on them is just horrid.

so your an achievement whore? Might I recomend Hannah Montana and Terminator Salvation.

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

Damn straight I was, 'tis how I know. I'm not speaking out of my ass like a lot of other people do.

So you play shit games? lol

Nah I was just getting some campaign achievements. I like the campaigns of COD and BFBC but the online on them is just horrid.

so your an achievement whore? Might I recomend Hannah Montana and Terminator Salvation.

Nah I'm beyond that. I'm not playing bad games just for achievements anymore. And unless I really like that particular game I don't do for them unless they are easy. It took me like 5 minutes to get that Demolish Part 2 thing.

cod takes skill, it's just a different kind of skill, its more of knowing what routes and how most people move around a map, you also have to know what guns to use, and if your getting killed by campers alot it's because your not paying attention or checking your corners. btw mw2 was pretty garbage (compared to mw1) but black ops is looking good. I love the fact theres no nuke in bo, it got annoying in mw2 because the people I played with use to get them all the time.

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

Damn straight I was, 'tis how I know. I'm not speaking out of my ass like a lot of other people do.

So you play shit games? lol

Nah I was just getting some campaign achievements. I like the campaigns of COD and BFBC but the online on them is just horrid.

so your an achievement whore? Might I recomend Hannah Montana and Terminator Salvation.

Nah I'm beyond that. I'm not playing bad games just for achievements anymore. And unless I really like that particular game I don't do for them unless they are easy. It took me like 5 minutes to get that Demolish Part 2 thing.

at least get King Kong. That was cool And just by completing the game once you get 1000 gamerscore from it.

DemonWolf wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Eiffel65 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

It's a piece of crap, just like every other modern "realistic" shooter out there.

And the second latest game you played was BFBC2, a modern "realistic" shooter.

Damn straight I was, 'tis how I know. I'm not speaking out of my ass like a lot of other people do.

So you play shit games? lol

Nah I was just getting some campaign achievements. I like the campaigns of COD and BFBC but the online on them is just horrid.

so your an achievement whore? Might I recomend Hannah Montana and Terminator Salvation.

Nah I'm beyond that. I'm not playing bad games just for achievements anymore. And unless I really like that particular game I don't do for them unless they are easy. It took me like 5 minutes to get that Demolish Part 2 thing.

at least get King Kong. That was cool And just by completing the game once you get 1000 gamerscore from it.

lol my cousin played hannah montana and got like 10% of trophies in it and bcuz of that one of my other cousins has stopped talking to him altogether lol