New Cod next Year

Yep the newest Cod Perhaps MW3 is out next year http://au.gamespot.com/news/6283588.html

Perhaps MW3.But I think its the sledgehammer deveoper one.it'd be cool to see a sci fi CoD.Then id really be interested

Arbiteris wrote:

Perhaps MW3.But I think its the sledgehammer deveoper one.it'd be cool to see a sci fi CoD.Then id really be interested

i would love a scifi cod to see how it would stack to Halo ( prob not well) i say the next cod should be a scifi better than MW type cods

COD is the new dynasty warrior .

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

can't be worse than MW2 online vise.
I liked the campagin of MW2 even though it was short.
Also, fuck the favela level.

WHAT SUPRISE 3 cods in 3 years woopdy doo

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

if it aint broke, dont fix it

Critisizing games for being very similer is pure BS

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

if it aint broke, dont fix it

Critisizing games for being very similer is pure BS

What if the original was bad then? I am sure you remember the Runners, Campers, and Quick-scopers that plagued MW2's multiplayer, and you know what? The games mechanics helped them do that. The multiplayer had quite a few flaws (ex; the servers) and the story was too short and had a bad cliffhanger ending. It clearly was broken in terms of multiplayer servers though, no denying that.

Also having games be too similar can be a criticism, if it is too similar then why would I have any incentive to purchase the game at all?

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

generic story?
black ops is different..very different in way they potrey the story from the other cod games,play it,you will see what i mean

Deus Ex Machina wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

if it aint broke, dont fix it

Critisizing games for being very similer is pure BS

What if the original was bad then? I am sure you remember the Runners, Campers, and Quick-scopers that plagued MW2's multiplayer, and you know what? The games mechanics helped them do that. The multiplayer had quite a few flaws (ex; the servers) and the story was too short and had a bad cliffhanger ending. It clearly was broken in terms of multiplayer servers though, no denying that.

Also having games be too similar can be a criticism, if it is too similar then why would I have any incentive to purchase the game at all?

Funny how you use MW2.The only "bad" game is the series.WaW and CoD 4 were awesome.Why dont you use that instead?More CoD games have been good then bad so I dont see why you use MW2.....

Because if you enjoy the kind of game and seirs then im sure you will want to buy the next installment.For new story, campaign, maps and guns/modes.THAT is why people do and always will buy these games.

Arbiteris wrote:

Deus Ex Machina wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

if it aint broke, dont fix it

Critisizing games for being very similer is pure BS

What if the original was bad then? I am sure you remember the Runners, Campers, and Quick-scopers that plagued MW2's multiplayer, and you know what? The games mechanics helped them do that. The multiplayer had quite a few flaws (ex; the servers) and the story was too short and had a bad cliffhanger ending. It clearly was broken in terms of multiplayer servers though, no denying that.

Also having games be too similar can be a criticism, if it is too similar then why would I have any incentive to purchase the game at all?

Funny how you use MW2.The only "bad" game is the series.WaW and CoD 4 were awesome.Why dont you use that instead?More CoD games have been good then bad so I dont see why you use MW2.....

Because if you enjoy the kind of game and seirs then im sure you will want to buy the next installment.For new story, campaign, maps and guns/modes.THAT is why people do and always will buy these games.

Whether or not those games were good is opinionated. Though they were sure as hell better (At least MW1, I do not own WAW).

You might, but if the only difference is story then I still have no incentive to buy it (this mostly only applies to FPS), since COD is a game made for multiplayer and is a $60 rip-off without online.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

Modern Warfare 1 and 2 had pretty good stories.

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

Modern Warfare 1 and 2 had pretty good stories.

I agree.Though MW2's story telling sucked(the mission breifings could be so confusing when you first play it), the plot itself was good.Some good plot twists too.

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

if it aint broke, dont fix it

Critisizing games for being very similer is pure BS

Modern Warfare 2 WAS broken. So therefore they have to fix it.

IGn has posted that a internet scource has confirmed that the sledgehammer developer is working on a Cod sci fi.Another thing that backs this up is a few months ago Activision bought the right to have "Future Warfare" "Space Warfare" and sometthing else for their games titles.

If they make a sci fi cod, it will get owned by the other great sci fi shooters out there.

COD is the new madden

Arbiteris wrote:

IGn has posted that a internet scource has confirmed that the sledgehammer developer is working on a Cod sci fi.Another thing that backs this up is a few months ago Activision bought the right to have "Future Warfare" "Space Warfare" and sometthing else for their games titles.

If they make a sci fi cod, it will get owned by the other great sci fi shooters out there.

Seems like they are going after Halo now, whos side are you gonna take Arbiteris?

Arbiteris wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

Modern Warfare 1 and 2 had pretty good stories.

I agree.Though MW2's story telling sucked(the mission breifings could be so confusing when you first play it), the plot itself was good.Some good plot twists too.

You guys who think COD has a good story, really need to pick up a book.

Pickles wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

Modern Warfare 1 and 2 had pretty good stories.

I agree.Though MW2's story telling sucked(the mission breifings could be so confusing when you first play it), the plot itself was good.Some good plot twists too.

You guys who think COD has a good story, really need to pick up a book.

I've probably read more books in the past 3 months than you have in the last 3 years. On a video game medium, it has a pretty good story. You can't compare books to video games.

BlackStigma wrote:

Pickles wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

I would love it if this CoD wouldn't happen.

Why? MW2 sucks, but all the others were good. And they have 2 year development cycles, not just 1.

Unless they actually change the gameplay or somehow make the game better, its really just the same game getting repackaged with a new generic story.

Modern Warfare 1 and 2 had pretty good stories.

I agree.Though MW2's story telling sucked(the mission breifings could be so confusing when you first play it), the plot itself was good.Some good plot twists too.

You guys who think COD has a good story, really need to pick up a book.

I've probably read more books in the past 3 months than you have in the last 3 years. On a video game medium, it has a pretty good story. You can't compare books to video games.

I think you can start comparing them these days. Games like Heavy Rain and Mass Effect have stories which are on the same level as novels.

these games get very boring, very quickly for me especially the multiplayer. not just call of duty but most first person shooters. i try to get into them but i just cant see what makes them so appealing for people to play for a year until the next one comes out. the multiplayer especally is really boring, shoot, camp, shoot, run, camp, snipe is all i see in these overhyped franchises. i think the only game that changed my opinion slightly was bad company 2 and that got boring after a while.

ghost23 wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

IGn has posted that a internet scource has confirmed that the sledgehammer developer is working on a Cod sci fi.Another thing that backs this up is a few months ago Activision bought the right to have "Future Warfare" "Space Warfare" and sometthing else for their games titles.

If they make a sci fi cod, it will get owned by the other great sci fi shooters out there.

Seems like they are going after Halo now, whos side are you gonna take Arbiteris?

Halo of course.CoD is the best modern shooter out there but when it comes to sci fi?Ptffff its gonna get owned