New Cod next Year

The Modern Warfare storyline is unique. Forget about the context of whether it's a Movie, book or a video game. How many American writers do you know of that have created a story where America DOES NOT save the world with high fives all round? Better still it's the British who are the true hero's in the Modern Warfare universe.

In reality Americans are too busy trying to blame a nation for an oil spill opposed to the actual company that caused it. What's most ironic is the majority of BP shareholders are actually U.S. citizens but they chose to play the Anglophobia card instead.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. wrote:

The Modern Warfare storyline is unique. Forget about the context of whether it's a Movie, book or a video game. How many American writers do you know of that have created a story where America DOES NOT save the world with high fives all round? Better still it's the British who are the true hero's in the Modern Warfare universe.

In reality Americans are too busy trying to blame a nation for an oil spill opposed to the actual company that caused it. What's most ironic is the majority of BP shareholders are actually U.S. citizens but they chose to play the Anglophobia card instead.

Yes it is nice to see someone other then America take the spotlight, lets just hope we don't have games excessively making one nation play the part of the hero (America or not).

As for the blaming Britain for the BP oil spill, well, coming from someone who lives in America I have never heard anyone say it was Britain's fault, just BP's.

I think Activision is milking Call of Duty since World at War so bad, with nothing new, and boring as hell. And I don't understand that people still want to buy a 'new' Call of Duty every year.

I mean, it's not funny anymore after buying the game a billion times, while everything is the same.

i don't care if each cod has 2 year cycles,its still releasing every year and that is dumb. killing the franchise.

Master Chief wrote:

I think Activision is milking Call of Duty since World at War so bad, with nothing new, and boring as hell. And I don't understand that people still want to buy a 'new' Call of Duty every year.

I mean, it's not funny anymore after buying the game a billion times, while everything is the same.

world at war had nothing new?
zombies,gore,new killstreak like the attack dogs,split screen campaign,online etc..

So there will be no Modern Warfare 3? Or is this the same?

Lethal Predator wrote:

So thetre will be no Modern Warfare 3? Or is this the same?

There probably will be an MW3 after this next one comes out. 2011's cod is set in the future, whereas MW is set in like 2015 or something.

BlackStigma wrote:

Lethal Predator wrote:

So thetre will be no Modern Warfare 3? Or is this the same?

There probably will be an MW3 after this next one comes out. 2011's cod is set in the future, whereas MW is set in like 2015 or something.

Where did you get that? MW3 is next fall by iw. also isn't there 2 cod games scheduled for next year. i seriously doubt bobby will let 2011 slip without a mw game.

Spartan v07 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Lethal Predator wrote:

So thetre will be no Modern Warfare 3? Or is this the same?

There probably will be an MW3 after this next one comes out. 2011's cod is set in the future, whereas MW is set in like 2015 or something.

Where did you get that? MW3 is next fall by iw. also isn't there 2 cod games scheduled for next year. i seriously doubt bobby will let 2011 slip without a mw game.

http://www.insanebear.com/3625/reactions-next-cod-to-be-sci-fi/

Two cods wouldn't release in the same year, Activision wouldn't compete against itself.

BlackStigma wrote:

Spartan v07 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Lethal Predator wrote:

So thetre will be no Modern Warfare 3? Or is this the same?

There probably will be an MW3 after this next one comes out. 2011's cod is set in the future, whereas MW is set in like 2015 or something.

Where did you get that? MW3 is next fall by iw. also isn't there 2 cod games scheduled for next year. i seriously doubt bobby will let 2011 slip without a mw game.

http://www.insanebear.com/3625/reactions-next-cod-to-be-sci-fi/

Two cods wouldn't release in the same year, Activision wouldn't compete against itself.

it's a rumor though,nothing concrete. that seems dumb because i don't think the cod fan base likes sci fi titles. also what will iw be doing then.

Spartan v07 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Spartan v07 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Lethal Predator wrote:

So thetre will be no Modern Warfare 3? Or is this the same?

There probably will be an MW3 after this next one comes out. 2011's cod is set in the future, whereas MW is set in like 2015 or something.

Where did you get that? MW3 is next fall by iw. also isn't there 2 cod games scheduled for next year. i seriously doubt bobby will let 2011 slip without a mw game.

http://www.insanebear.com/3625/reactions-next-cod-to-be-sci-fi/

Two cods wouldn't release in the same year, Activision wouldn't compete against itself.

it's a rumor though,nothing concrete. that seems dumb because i don't think the cod fan base likes sci fi titles. also what will iw be doing then.

IW lost like all it's good people, they're probably still highering some people right now or something. And I think Activision is doing Sci-fi because they know that other sci-fi games like Halo sell well. And for a rumor it seems pretty solid with buying the domain name and all.

BlackStigma wrote:

Spartan v07 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Spartan v07 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Lethal Predator wrote:

So thetre will be no Modern Warfare 3? Or is this the same?

There probably will be an MW3 after this next one comes out. 2011's cod is set in the future, whereas MW is set in like 2015 or something.

Where did you get that? MW3 is next fall by iw. also isn't there 2 cod games scheduled for next year. i seriously doubt bobby will let 2011 slip without a mw game.

http://www.insanebear.com/3625/reactions-next-cod-to-be-sci-fi/

Two cods wouldn't release in the same year, Activision wouldn't compete against itself.

it's a rumor though,nothing concrete. that seems dumb because i don't think the cod fan base likes sci fi titles. also what will iw be doing then.

IW lost like all it's good people, they're probably still highering some people right now or something. And I think Activision is doing Sci-fi because they know that other sci-fi games like Halo sell well. And for a rumor it seems pretty solid with buying the domain name and all.

Yeah, them buying up all the sci fi type domains is pretty much a confirmation that it is going to be in space.

They are probably gonna milk it...again. At least the stories are good.

NobleSix wrote:

Master Chief wrote:

I think Activision is milking Call of Duty since World at War so bad, with nothing new, and boring as hell. And I don't understand that people still want to buy a 'new' Call of Duty every year.

I mean, it's not funny anymore after buying the game a billion times, while everything is the same.

world at war had nothing new?
zombies,gore,new killstreak like the attack dogs,split screen campaign,online etc..

What I meant was, Call of Duty 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were pretty good, but after 5 (World at War) everything went downhill, and it's not appealing for me anymore.

Master Chief wrote:

NobleSix wrote:

Master Chief wrote:

I think Activision is milking Call of Duty since World at War so bad, with nothing new, and boring as hell. And I don't understand that people still want to buy a 'new' Call of Duty every year.

I mean, it's not funny anymore after buying the game a billion times, while everything is the same.

world at war had nothing new?
zombies,gore,new killstreak like the attack dogs,split screen campaign,online etc..

What I meant was, Call of Duty 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were pretty good, but after 5 (World at War) everything went downhill, and it's not appealing for me anymore.

well okay..but i swear to god you typed..
"since World at War so bad,with nothing new, and boring as hell"

Pein wrote:

Master Chief wrote:

NobleSix wrote:

Master Chief wrote:

I think Activision is milking Call of Duty since World at War so bad, with nothing new, and boring as hell. And I don't understand that people still want to buy a 'new' Call of Duty every year.

I mean, it's not funny anymore after buying the game a billion times, while everything is the same.

world at war had nothing new?
zombies,gore,new killstreak like the attack dogs,split screen campaign,online etc..

What I meant was, Call of Duty 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were pretty good, but after 5 (World at War) everything went downhill, and it's not appealing for me anymore.

well okay..but i swear to god you typed..
"since World at War so bad,with nothing new, and boring as hell"

Yeah, since World at War, the series has gone downhill with nothing new.

mw 2 is decent. i still think cod 1 is the best one in the series.