Master Chief vs Commander Shepard

Me and my friend were having a debate on who would win.
I want to hear you guys.
Who wins.
2 hours of prep.
Bloodlusted.
Who wins?


or

Well if it's a one on one fight I think the 7'2, 1000lbs super solider has a slight advantage.

Stoney wrote:

Well if it's a one on one fight I think the 7'2, 1000lbs super solider has a slight advantage.

Took the words right out of my mouth.

Cheif.He would destroy shepard in a fight not to mention he looks alot more badasss in the pics

Bio-augmented super solider with enhanced neural response and chemically strengthened muscles. Master Chief would win even without his armor on.

both have shields but chief has thicker armor and augmented muscles/bones/reaction time.

not to mention he has been trained since age 6.....

shephard..come on he took on all the geth,stopped saren and sovereign,got all the most badass people from all the alien races in me2 and stopped the collectors at the end which seemed impossible,and in me3 he is going to save the earth and bring all the other races to finish the fight..so for me..im voting for shephard

In a fight, Master Chief of course.
But Shepherd is a more interesting character in the games.

Pein wrote:

shephard..come on he took on all the geth,stopped saren and sovereign,got all the most badass people from all the alien races in me2 and stopped the collectors at the end which seemed impossible,and in me3 he is going to save the earth and bring all the other races to finish the fight..so for me..im voting for shephard

Yea, and Master Cheif stopped Halo from wiping out the entire galaxy....

Arbiteris wrote:

Pein wrote:

shephard..come on he took on all the geth,stopped saren and sovereign,got all the most badass people from all the alien races in me2 and stopped the collectors at the end which seemed impossible,and in me3 he is going to save the earth and bring all the other races to finish the fight..so for me..im voting for shephard

Yea, and Master Cheif stopped Halo from wiping out the entire galaxy....

lol you've got him there. That being said I do like Shepherd as a character more. But Garrus pwnz them all.

Chief rarely says a thing. but he wins in a fight

Arbiteris wrote:

Pein wrote:

shephard..come on he took on all the geth,stopped saren and sovereign,got all the most badass people from all the alien races in me2 and stopped the collectors at the end which seemed impossible,and in me3 he is going to save the earth and bring all the other races to finish the fight..so for me..im voting for shephard

Yea, and Master Cheif stopped Halo from wiping out the entire galaxy....

Plus Shepard had a whole team with him. Chief is all by himself and he still owns.

Chief would win in a fight, but Shepard is a hell of a better character. Chief is boring and stale.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Chief would win in a fight, but Shepard is a hell of a better character. Chief is boring and stale.

hes a silent protagonist in the games(Silent protagonists are better imo) but he is actually a very good character if youve read the novels.And he sure as hell isnt stale or boring.I mean seriously, kicking covvie ass, then flood ass then blowing up Halo is stale and boring my ass.

Read Fall of Reach.REALLY good novel

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Chief would win in a fight, but Shepard is a hell of a better character. Chief is boring and stale.

hes a silent protagonist in the games(Silent protagonists are better imo) but he is actually a very good character if youve read the novels.And he sure as hell isnt stale or boring.I mean seriously, kicking covvie ass, then flood ass then blowing up Halo is stale and boring my ass.

Read Fall of Reach.REALLY good novel

Silent protaganist's better? No way. And he's technically not a silent protagnist, he has a VA and quiet a few lines. It's just none are very memorable.

Stoney wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Chief would win in a fight, but Shepard is a hell of a better character. Chief is boring and stale.

hes a silent protagonist in the games(Silent protagonists are better imo) but he is actually a very good character if youve read the novels.And he sure as hell isnt stale or boring.I mean seriously, kicking covvie ass, then flood ass then blowing up Halo is stale and boring my ass.

Read Fall of Reach.REALLY good novel

Silent protaganist's better? No way. And he's technically not a silent protagnist, he has a VA and quiet a few lines. It's just none are very memorable.

Well hes mostly a silent protagonist.He technicaly isnt but hes bassically like one.Yea, I prefer protagonists that dont talk in shooters.i find onest hat talk much get a little annoying.Like Kratos and sometimes snake(he and his friends dont know when to shut the hell up).For example, "Ahh look its a huge metal gear thats about to blow us to peices!!Time to go on a 20min confusing and complex explanation of something before we fight it!!".MGS is still epic though

Master Chief would win. Commander Shepard is the better character though.

Stoney wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Chief would win in a fight, but Shepard is a hell of a better character. Chief is boring and stale.

hes a silent protagonist in the games(Silent protagonists are better imo) but he is actually a very good character if youve read the novels.And he sure as hell isnt stale or boring.I mean seriously, kicking covvie ass, then flood ass then blowing up Halo is stale and boring my ass.

Read Fall of Reach.REALLY good novel

Silent protaganist's better? No way. And he's technically not a silent protagnist, he has a VA and quiet a few lines. It's just none are very memorable.

o rly?

"I need a weapon"

"Finishing this fight"

those come to mind

GeneralMLD wrote:

Stoney wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Chief would win in a fight, but Shepard is a hell of a better character. Chief is boring and stale.

hes a silent protagonist in the games(Silent protagonists are better imo) but he is actually a very good character if youve read the novels.And he sure as hell isnt stale or boring.I mean seriously, kicking covvie ass, then flood ass then blowing up Halo is stale and boring my ass.

Read Fall of Reach.REALLY good novel

Silent protaganist's better? No way. And he's technically not a silent protagnist, he has a VA and quiet a few lines. It's just none are very memorable.

o rly?

"I need a weapon"

"Finishing this fight"

those come to mind

Don't forget the greatest line of them all: "Wake me, when you need me"

Arbiteris wrote:

Pein wrote:

shephard..come on he took on all the geth,stopped saren and sovereign,got all the most badass people from all the alien races in me2 and stopped the collectors at the end which seemed impossible,and in me3 he is going to save the earth and bring all the other races to finish the fight..so for me..im voting for shephard

Yea, and Master Cheif stopped Halo from wiping out the entire galaxy....

thats going to be the same with shephard.so what you said didnt really has big difference than shephard

mario wins hands down

GeneralMLD wrote:

Stoney wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Chief would win in a fight, but Shepard is a hell of a better character. Chief is boring and stale.

hes a silent protagonist in the games(Silent protagonists are better imo) but he is actually a very good character if youve read the novels.And he sure as hell isnt stale or boring.I mean seriously, kicking covvie ass, then flood ass then blowing up Halo is stale and boring my ass.

Read Fall of Reach.REALLY good novel

Silent protaganist's better? No way. And he's technically not a silent protagnist, he has a VA and quiet a few lines. It's just none are very memorable.

o rly?

"I need a weapon"

"Finishing this fight"

those come to mind

That particular one strengthens my case.

But how is John a boring character. I find him very unique.

Pein wrote:

Arbiteris wrote:

Pein wrote:

shephard..come on he took on all the geth,stopped saren and sovereign,got all the most badass people from all the alien races in me2 and stopped the collectors at the end which seemed impossible,and in me3 he is going to save the earth and bring all the other races to finish the fight..so for me..im voting for shephard

Yea, and Master Cheif stopped Halo from wiping out the entire galaxy....

thats going to be the same with shephard.so what you said didnt really has big difference than shephard

The reapers are shit compared to the flood(seeing as the flood could beat them if wanted) and even when the Reapers exterminate all civilization in the galaxy, life still grows back.The Halo arrays=total annihilattion of sentient life forever

The Reapers arent as hard to exterminate as the flood is.The more weapons, tech and soldiers you have, the more the flood will kick your ass.And before you say "Reapers cant be infected by the flood", yes they can.and they have infected non organic things plenty of times before.

One thing you got to remember about this is that we dont know everything about the reapers,flood or forerunner yet.

Shepard wouldnt be a big threat to Cheif at all.Cheif is stronger and has done much more than shepard has.

Both of them have shields, both of them are enhaced superhumans (if we are speaking about Mass Effect 2 Shepard), if we are asuming that Shepard is a soldier, that would be a hell of a fight, but in the end most probably Master Chief would be victorious.