Bioshock 2 IGN Review

im a bit dissapointd but heres the vid

I was disappointed too

I don't see the reason why both of you are dissapointed with the vid. I mean cmo'n the only thing that by the looks drop the rating to 9.1 was that we already know Rapture, which makes the games loose somehow that "mysterious" feeling. That usually happens in this type of games. For example the F.E.A.R 2 got even a worse score than Bioshock 2. It drop from 9.2 to 8.1.
And its still a kickass game, so its more than normal that this happened.

Hmmm Seems like it should have been DLC. Like a side story or something. Not a full $60 game. Just my opinion based off of what I've seen. I wasn't as huge a fan of the first one as everyone else so I guess my opinion isn't worth much.

360WNED wrote:

Hmmm Seems like it should have been DLC. Like a side story or something. Not a full $60 game. Just my opinion based off of what I've seen. I wasn't as huge a fan of the first one as everyone else so I guess my opinion isn't worth much.

I love the first one and this is a continuation of the story with an even bigger campaign and a new multiplayer mode. Sounds like a sequel to me. ODST was a side story, this is a full sequel. Besides 9.1 is a very good score. Why do people go nuts over decimal points?

Bioshock 2 was supposed to be a prequel, but only the multiplayer is.

IGN is highly biased and opinionated. They don't hide it well.

343_Guilty_Spark wrote:

360WNED wrote:

Hmmm Seems like it should have been DLC. Like a side story or something. Not a full $60 game. Just my opinion based off of what I've seen. I wasn't as huge a fan of the first one as everyone else so I guess my opinion isn't worth much.

I love the first one and this is a continuation of the story with an even bigger campaign and a new multiplayer mode. Sounds like a sequel to me. ODST was a side story, this is a full sequel. Besides 9.1 is a very good score. Why do people go nuts over decimal points?

i think the problem is bioshock 1 got 9.8 or 9.7 (i dont remember) and this one got 9.1,its a big difference

343_Guilty_Spark wrote:

360WNED wrote:

Hmmm Seems like it should have been DLC. Like a side story or something. Not a full $60 game. Just my opinion based off of what I've seen. I wasn't as huge a fan of the first one as everyone else so I guess my opinion isn't worth much.

I love the first one and this is a continuation of the story with an even bigger campaign and a new multiplayer mode. Sounds like a sequel to me. ODST was a side story, this is a full sequel. Besides 9.1 is a very good score. Why do people go nuts over decimal points?

love your post count 1111

lightlamp2 wrote:

343_Guilty_Spark wrote:

360WNED wrote:

Hmmm Seems like it should have been DLC. Like a side story or something. Not a full $60 game. Just my opinion based off of what I've seen. I wasn't as huge a fan of the first one as everyone else so I guess my opinion isn't worth much.

I love the first one and this is a continuation of the story with an even bigger campaign and a new multiplayer mode. Sounds like a sequel to me. ODST was a side story, this is a full sequel. Besides 9.1 is a very good score. Why do people go nuts over decimal points?

love your post count 1111

LMAO

343_Guilty_Spark wrote:

360WNED wrote:

Hmmm Seems like it should have been DLC. Like a side story or something. Not a full $60 game. Just my opinion based off of what I've seen. I wasn't as huge a fan of the first one as everyone else so I guess my opinion isn't worth much.

I love the first one and this is a continuation of the story with an even bigger campaign and a new multiplayer mode. Sounds like a sequel to me. ODST was a side story, this is a full sequel. Besides 9.1 is a very good score. Why do people go nuts over decimal points?

I said that because alot of the places are being reused. I know there are new spot's, but for the most part I'm sure it will be the same Rapture. (Not that it shouldn't be) Also even though the multiplayer adds a little something. We all know it will be forgotten like the MP in Prey. Give it a good 6 months if that. It will never be a COD or Halo. Not saying it has to be just saying the MP is nice, but in no way should be a driving force in owning it. Get where I'm going? Confusing I know.

AndrejTheReviewer wrote:

343_Guilty_Spark wrote:

360WNED wrote:

Hmmm Seems like it should have been DLC. Like a side story or something. Not a full $60 game. Just my opinion based off of what I've seen. I wasn't as huge a fan of the first one as everyone else so I guess my opinion isn't worth much.

I love the first one and this is a continuation of the story with an even bigger campaign and a new multiplayer mode. Sounds like a sequel to me. ODST was a side story, this is a full sequel. Besides 9.1 is a very good score. Why do people go nuts over decimal points?

i think the problem is bioshock 1 got 9.8 or 9.7 (i dont remember) and this one got 9.1,its a big difference

I don't know why people trip either. An A is an A regardless if it's a 92% or a 99%. People are way too petty.

Ah well, I don't own the first so I don't really know what to say xD

wat's wrong with the review

I dont see what's wrong with this review.It gave the game a 9.1 which is very good.

Bioshock doesnt interest me so i honestly dont care what it get's.