Gt5 rating prediction

What kind of ratings/reviews do you reckon Gran Turismo will get? Positive? Negative!

Gt psp showed critics aren't afraid to give the games of polyphony, a well respected company, bad ratings when they see fit. And gt psp was actually an excellent handheld racing game. The best available in fact.
So, there are improvements. Lots of cars, lots of tracks, great visuals for the most part and there's damage
and decent physics.

The downsides are bad damaging, ps2 upscaled cars with inferior interiors and it's been a long wait for the game!

Well, predict here what you think the reception for this game will be like.

Btw, fairly positive means a generally 7/10 rating
positive is more like 8, perhaps scraping a 9.
Extremely positive is a solid 9 to 10 with very very few negative reviews
anything below, you can work it out.

I can see it getting extremely positive reviews, although I'm keeping myself open to the fact that it may receive a few low scores.

Definitely positive reviews. Although some reviewers will judge the game on its lengthy development time.

Very positive. I bet Destructoid will give it a 1 though.

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

Definitely positive reviews. Although some reviewers will judge the game on its lengthy development time.

I think it's wrong to do that. Judge the game on the game. A great game that took five years to make is still a great game.

I think it will get very positive with all the stuff they are putting into it. I can see it being high AAA

TRF wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

Definitely positive reviews. Although some reviewers will judge the game on its lengthy development time.

I think it's wrong to do that. Judge the game on the game. A great game that took five years to make is still a great game.

Tell that to the people who rated down ODST because it cost $60. It was still a great addition to the Halo franchise.

ghost23 wrote:

TRF wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

Definitely positive reviews. Although some reviewers will judge the game on its lengthy development time.

I think it's wrong to do that. Judge the game on the game. A great game that took five years to make is still a great game.

Tell that to the people who rated down ODST because it cost $60. It was still a great addition to the Halo franchise.

Thats true. If they rate that down cause of cost they will rate GT5 down because of delays.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

ghost23 wrote:

TRF wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

Definitely positive reviews. Although some reviewers will judge the game on its lengthy development time.

I think it's wrong to do that. Judge the game on the game. A great game that took five years to make is still a great game.

Tell that to the people who rated down ODST because it cost $60. It was still a great addition to the Halo franchise.

Thats true. If they rate that down cause of cost they will rate GT5 down because of delays.

They rated it because of lack of content. GT5 should get good reviews because it has over 1000 cars, 70 tracks, and a youtube video maker.

I think this game will have a near perfect review avg.

TRF wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

Definitely positive reviews. Although some reviewers will judge the game on its lengthy development time.

I think it's wrong to do that. Judge the game on the game. A great game that took five years to make is still a great game.

But you know some reviewers will.

ODST deserved some low scores, IT WAS OVERPRICED DLC! *takes a deep breath* But GT5 is a full game and BTW how come GT5 is the only game in existence that gets attacked for a long development time when people dont care about how long they have to wait for games like starcraft 2 (IT TOOK 10 YEARS AND I NEVER SAW ANYBODY COMPLAIN!!!!)

Doominator99 wrote:

ODST deserved some low scores, IT WAS OVERPRICED DLC! *takes a deep breath* But GT5 is a full game and BTW how come GT5 is the only game in existence that gets attacked for a long development time when people dont care about how long they have to wait for games like starcraft 2 (IT TOOK 10 YEARS AND I NEVER SAW ANYBODY COMPLAIN!!!!)

GT5 isn't the only game this happens to. ::cough::Duke Nukem Forever::cough::

ghost23 wrote:

TRF wrote:

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

Definitely positive reviews. Although some reviewers will judge the game on its lengthy development time.

I think it's wrong to do that. Judge the game on the game. A great game that took five years to make is still a great game.

Tell that to the people who rated down ODST because it cost $60. It was still a great addition to the Halo franchise.

I think if a game sucks, then price shouldn't matter. I wouldn't take ODST for free because I hated it. Besides, there's a difference between rating a game down for lack of content and rating a game down because the developer wanted to perfect it.

Lord_Orpheo wrote:

Doominator99 wrote:

ODST deserved some low scores, IT WAS OVERPRICED DLC! *takes a deep breath* But GT5 is a full game and BTW how come GT5 is the only game in existence that gets attacked for a long development time when people dont care about how long they have to wait for games like starcraft 2 (IT TOOK 10 YEARS AND I NEVER SAW ANYBODY COMPLAIN!!!!)

GT5 isn't the only game this happens to. ::cough::Duke Nukem Forever::cough::

never heard of it so i dunno

Doominator99 wrote:

Lord_Orpheo wrote:

Doominator99 wrote:

ODST deserved some low scores, IT WAS OVERPRICED DLC! *takes a deep breath* But GT5 is a full game and BTW how come GT5 is the only game in existence that gets attacked for a long development time when people dont care about how long they have to wait for games like starcraft 2 (IT TOOK 10 YEARS AND I NEVER SAW ANYBODY COMPLAIN!!!!)

GT5 isn't the only game this happens to. ::cough::Duke Nukem Forever::cough::

never heard of it so i dunno

It was announced in 1997

DemonWolf wrote:

What kind of ratings/reviews do you reckon Gran Turismo will get? Positive? Negative!

Gt psp showed critics aren't afraid to give the games of polyphony, a well respected company, bad ratings when they see fit. And gt psp was actually an excellent handheld racing game. The best available in fact.
So, there are improvements. Lots of cars, lots of tracks, great visuals for the most part and there's damageand decent physics.

The downsides are bad damaging, ps2 upscaled cars with inferior interiors and it's been a long wait for the game!

Well, predict here what you think the reception for this game will be like.

GT5 has ALOT more content than that

Quote :

More than 950 stunning cars, from family runarounds to growling supercars hot off the production lines of manufacturers such as Ferrari, Lamborghini and Bugatti

More than 20 gorgeous locations and over 70 track variations to master

Unrivalled realism and incredibly detailed graphics take you as close to real racing as is humanly possible

Series favourites GT Mode, Arcade Mode and License Test return, and you can now race in NASCAR and WRC events

Compete on the world stage in improved online multiplayer modes

Transfer your garage the PSP version of Gran Turismo and get a head-start over your friends and rivals

Wheather Effects

Night Racing

A Management Mode

Stunt Arenas

Kart Racing

A Track Editor

Realtime Damage

Playable in stereostopic 3D

Head Tracking by use of the PS Eye

The game has been made with 1080p 60fps in mind

Amazing Physics

Gt5 will get extremely positive reviews ranging from a 97 - 100

resistance354 wrote:

DemonWolf wrote:

What kind of ratings/reviews do you reckon Gran Turismo will get? Positive? Negative!

Gt psp showed critics aren't afraid to give the games of polyphony, a well respected company, bad ratings when they see fit. And gt psp was actually an excellent handheld racing game. The best available in fact.
So, there are improvements. Lots of cars, lots of tracks, great visuals for the most part and there's damageand decent physics.

The downsides are bad damaging, ps2 upscaled cars with inferior interiors and it's been a long wait for the game!

Well, predict here what you think the reception for this game will be like.

GT5 has ALOT more content than that

Quote :

More than 950 stunning cars, from family runarounds to growling supercars hot off the production lines of manufacturers such as Ferrari, Lamborghini and Bugatti

More than 20 gorgeous locations and over 70 track variations to master

Unrivalled realism and incredibly detailed graphics take you as close to real racing as is humanly possible

Series favourites GT Mode, Arcade Mode and License Test return, and you can now race in NASCAR and WRC events

Compete on the world stage in improved online multiplayer modes

Transfer your garage the PSP version of Gran Turismo and get a head-start over your friends and rivals

Wheather Effects

Night Racing

A Management Mode

Stunt Arenas

Kart Racing

A Track Editor

Realtime Damage

Playable in stereostopic 3D

Head Tracking by use of the PS Eye

The game has been made with 1080p 60fps in mind

Amazing Physics

Gt5 will get extremely positive reviews ranging from a 97 - 100

Your hopes are too high. 97-100? Seriously I hate people who don't think realistically. Only 200 cars will be the actual promised quality put by Prologue. It will DEFINANTELY get marked down for over 800 cars not having cockpits and being upscaled models. But other than that...it's a solid 90-94.

I've never heard of a game being docked for development time. That doesn't really make sense to me. Cost is another thing. $60 for a 5 hour game is something people need to be warned about. *cough*HeavenlySword*cough*

I have high expectations for GT5. Loved Prolouge, and I'm going to buy one of those awesome wheel accessories with the force feedback.

I think it depends on if they grade it based on how long it was in development.

XenoTempest wrote:

I think it depends on if they grade it based on how long it was in development.

Most will not.
But some will, I'm sure of that.

Why ratings?....stupid crap.