Console Wars Round 7: Xbox 360 Vs. PS3 (Online Experience)

"is xboxlive worth $60 a year the answer is yes" something we all know but needs to be hammered into the heads of ps3 fanboys.

Round 7: PSN vs. Xbox Live from Lasse Pulkkinen on Vimeo.

STABILITY & LACK OF ISSUES & DECENT INTERFACE WITH INTEGRATION WITH ONLINE FEATURES!
Thats what ps3 owners are missing out on.

damn right!

matrixrory wrote:

"is xboxlive worth $60 a year the answer is yes" something we all know but needs to be hammered into the heads of ps3 fanboys.

You pay $60 dollars a year? I pay $50 dollars.

Its €50 in most of Europe...Or someplaces (here in Ireland) its €40.

demondragondude wrote:

STABILITY & LACK OF ISSUES & DECENT INTERFACE WITH INTEGRATION WITH ONLINE FEATURES!
Thats what ps3 owners are missing out on.

im going to get a 360 soon.so i have to see which is better..i still think psn is great.i dont need more from that

Amazon.com currently has 12 months XBL for $35!

Xbox Live pwns PSN... because of its quality. A much more quality service than PSN.

I shall even admit Live does have PSN in a head lock here but PSN is growing maybe too slow for much of a competition. Also the PS3 VS 360 thing that TechnoBufalo do is very interesting I think every one here should take a look

At least he spoke da truth.

I don't get why PS3 fanboys say that PSN is better than XBL. It's really not. I can't tell you how easily everything is integrated and strung together on XBL. On the PS3, to access certain features like the PSN Store and certain settings, I have to load a program which takes forever, or for settings, I'd have to leave my game, which is annoying. For example, on XBL, to adjust the volume of my headset, I just click the Guide button, and go through x amount of menus (I can't remember exactly how many or which menus), and I can change my headset settings while remaining in-game. With PSN, I'd have to hit the XMB button, scroll through x amount of menus, go to the settings option, leave the game, adjust the settings, then re-renter the game, which is annoying, and one of the many reasons why I prefer XBL over PSN. I just love that silky-smooth integration, and to me, that's worth at least $25 of the $50/yr.

BU BU BU BUT ITS FREE!

only argument retarded trey fanboys have.. psn is not nearly as unified or as good as live.

ZaFtxX wrote:

BU BU BU BUT ITS FREE!

only argument retarded trey fanboys have.. psn is not nearly as unified or as good as live.

Hey, you get what you pay for.

When PSN copies XBL, its always an inferior copy (eg. achievements/trophies). When XBL copies PSN, its always superior copy(Home/GameRoom)

ghost23 wrote:

When PSN copies XBL, its always an inferior copy (eg. achievements/trophies). When XBL copies PSN, its always superior copy(Home/GameRoom)

Well, I actually like Trophies better than Achievements, but I wish Trophies were easier to track (there's this whole syncing operation that's annoying, and half the time it fails).

And we don't know how Game Room is going to be, but it'll probably be better than Home, considering how useless Home is.

Yeah, Xbox's game room is pretty much what I thought PSHome was going to be.

EventGamer wrote:

ghost23 wrote:

When PSN copies XBL, its always an inferior copy (eg. achievements/trophies). When XBL copies PSN, its always superior copy(Home/GameRoom)

Well, I actually like Trophies better than Achievements, but I wish Trophies were easier to track (there's this whole syncing operation that's annoying, and half the time it fails).

And we don't know how Game Room is going to be, but it'll probably be better than Home, considering how useless Home is.

I only like acheivements because there are 4 kinds of trophies over on PS3. I would want a platinum but I would get a bronze or a silver or whatever. I would be like WTF did I do wrong!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

And that is why I HATE TROPHIES!!!!!