Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.
+5
Teckno
ghost23
Inuboy1000
lightlamp
Stigma
9 posters
Author
Message
Stigma Four Star General (Moderator)
Posts : 2309 Join date : 2009-12-01 Location : US
Subject: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:49 pm
Here is the price of them.
Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)
Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion) However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.
So Move - $210
Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3? 360 Pro - $300 with 60GB PS3 - $400 with 80GB However the PS3 had a wi-fi adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)
So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.
It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?
Last edited by BlackStigma on Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
lightlamp Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts : 948 Join date : 2009-09-11
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:54 pm
Never thought about that heh good for pointing that out
Inuboy1000 Fleet Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts : 681 Join date : 2010-07-15 Age : 30 Location : None of Your Business!
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:26 pm
So basically the PS3 fanboys are hypocrites now.
ghost23 Four Star General (Moderator)
Posts : 3425 Join date : 2009-12-16 Location : Australia
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:54 pm
This thread has already been made multiple times.
Move does indeed have the worst pricing structure I have ever seen for anything.
Teckno Command Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts : 596 Join date : 2010-07-27
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:23 pm
Actually, Kinect games are more expensive. I think 10$ more.
Invincible Fleet Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts : 672 Join date : 2010-03-18
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:32 pm
Last year I was super hyped for Natal/Kinect. It was one of the reasons I got a new 360 elite. Because I wanted to be ready when it came out. But after watching the E3 conference I've pretty much lost interest. I don't think the tech will work like it's supposed to and the launch games are only for the most casual of gamers.
Master_Chief Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Posts : 3050 Join date : 2009-09-30 Location : Area 51
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:51 pm
FullMetalKendo wrote:
So basically the PS3 fanboys are hypocrites now.
The PS3 fanboys have always been hypocrites.
Stoney Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Posts : 2812 Join date : 2009-11-03 Age : 35 Location : In the gutter
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:12 am
BlackStigma wrote:
Here is the price of them.
Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)
Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion) However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.
So Move - $210
Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3? 360 Pro - $300 with 60GB PS3 - $400 with 80GB However the PS3 had a wife adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)
So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.
It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?
I know its a typo, but its a funny one at that. "However the PS3 had a wife adapter"
Arbiteris Four Star General (Moderator)
Posts : 5064 Join date : 2009-09-15 Location : Sanghelios
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:18 am
xSTONEYx187x wrote:
BlackStigma wrote:
Here is the price of them.
Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)
Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion) However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.
So Move - $210
Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3? 360 Pro - $300 with 60GB PS3 - $400 with 80GB However the PS3 had a wife adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)
So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.
It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?
I know its a typo, but its a funny one at that. "However the PS3 had a wife adapter"
Lmao
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments. Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:09 pm
xSTONEYx187x wrote:
BlackStigma wrote:
Here is the price of them.
Kinect - $150 (Kinect and Kinect Adventures)
Move - $100 starter bundle (PSwand, PSeye, and Sports Champion) However you also need a Navigation Controller so $130. Kinect can scan 6 people and support 2 active players, so for multiplayer you need another $80 with Move.
So Move - $210
Remember 2 years ago with the 360 and PS3? 360 Pro - $300 with 60GB PS3 - $400 with 80GB However the PS3 had a wife adapter and the controller charged with USB. It lacked a mic however. But it also had a blueray drive and free online gaming. Basically the 360 had accessories that weren't absolutely necessary but the PS3 came standard with them. It's like Kinect and Move, although Move appears to be cheaper at first it actually has some hidden cost that the 360 had. (that aren't completely necessary)
So Move may be cheaper or more expensive under certain conditions (such as only 1 player), Kinect has everything you need and you don't need extra stuff so it has a better value like the PS3 did back then.
It's just like the 360 vs. PS3 price argument but switched around. It's very ironic, has anybody else noticed it?
I know its a typo, but its a funny one at that. "However the PS3 had a wife adapter"
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.
Kinect vs. Move, one of the most ironic arguments.