Halo Reach graphics PWN Uncharted 2 and Heavy Rain: Face Rendering

and d1drftgp is my live gamertag to take a look

d1drftgp wrote:

i'm not a ps3 owner im a pc gamer and i was just stating that they are cgi rendered graphs i wanted an intelligent debate but you ban me because you assumed i was a ps3 "fantard" well kind sir i'm not an ps3 owner and i think 360 has a good line up for 2010 i was just pointing some things out

You give your facts....and you will get a rational response...instead of just writing off the Halo Reach footage as CGI...when it was in fact in-game footage...what is it you would like to debate without flaming?

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=229698

xSTONEYx187x wrote:

d1drftgp wrote:

i'm not a ps3 owner im a pc gamer and i was just stating that they are cgi rendered graphs i wanted an intelligent debate but you ban me because you assumed i was a ps3 "fantard" well kind sir i'm not an ps3 owner and i think 360 has a good line up for 2010 i was just pointing some things out

You give your facts....and you will get a rational response...instead of just writing off the Halo Reach footage as CGI...when it was in fact in-game footage...what is it you would like to debate without flaming?

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=229698

Hes a troll bypassing a ban under another profile. Banned.

why a people saying it was CGI thats just a compliment to bungie and there epic work, and if it wasnt CGI why is there jaggies and some lo res textures,

day walker wrote:

why a people saying it was CGI thats just a compliment to bungie and there epic work, and if it wasnt CGI why is there jaggies and some lo res textures,

I agree. And in my Game Informer the gameplay screenshots are on par with the trailer. And during Game Informers hands on with a playable demo they made no mention of any graphical diffirence between the trailer and the demo but said it was a huge leap from Halo 3.

Master_Chief wrote:

day walker wrote:

why a people saying it was CGI thats just a compliment to bungie and there epic work, and if it wasnt CGI why is there jaggies and some lo res textures,

I agree. And in my Game Informer the gameplay screenshots are on par with the trailer. And during Game Informers hands on with a playable demo they made no mention of any graphical diffirence between the trailer and the demo but said it was a huge leap from Halo 3.

yeah exactly i have yet to see the really good looking GI pics but i will hopefully tomorrow, but if anything the animations are a huge step up of epic, i mean look at this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kiby2RBvFeE&feature=related now look at the people walking behind them, looks like they want to take a dump, now this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kco1sYXGwYE&channel=bungie has better animations in walking than killzone 2, and will be on par if over the graphical quality of killzone 2 but i havent seen the GI good looking pics.